ASPG Menu
search

American Scientific Publishing Group

verified Journal

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics

ISSN
Online: 2833-5597
Frequency

Continuous publication

Publication Model

Open access journal. All articles are freely available online with no APC.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics
Full Length Article

Volume 11Issue 2PP: 01–19 • 2026

Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization

Ebrahim A. Mattar 1*
1College of Engineering, University of Bahrain, Bahrain
* Corresponding Author.
Received: January 29, 2026 Revised: March 28, 2026 Accepted: May 19, 2026

Abstract

Keystroke Dynamics Analysis (KDA) is a prominent behavioral biometric technique for continuous user authentication in digital environments. Yet, keystroke timing prediction remains challenging due to individual typing variability, temporal inconsistencies, and the tendency of machine learning models to overfit in high dimensional spaces when hyperparameters are poorly tuned. This study formulates the task as predicting keystroke timing intervals—dwell times, keydown–keydown latencies, and keyup–keydown latencies—for a fixed password sequence. We introduce a predictive framework that integrates the Dipper Throated Optimizer (DTO) with regression modeling, using a sequential dual optimization strategy: binary DTO (bDTO) first selects informative feature subsets, followed by standard DTO to fine-tune the hyperparameters of a Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR). This design balances exploration and exploitation to address the complexity of optimization in behavioral biometric data. Experimental validation on the Keystroke Dynamics Benchmark Dataset demonstrates stepwise performance gains: the baseline GBR achieved an MSE of 0.014244, reduced to 0.004768 after bDTO based feature selection (66.5% improvement), and further refined to an MSE of 0.000003 with DTO hyperparameter tuning (99.97% relative improvement), a result interpreted with caution due to potential overfitting risks. The optimized model also attained R2 = 0.9824, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency = 0.9786, and Willmott Index = 0.9810, underscoring strong predictive agreement between observed and predicted timing intervals.

Keywords

Keystroke Dynamics Analysis Behavioral Biometrics Gradient Boosting Regressor Metaheuristic Optimization Dipper Throated Optimizer

References

[1] S. A. Alsuhibany and A. S. Almuqbil, “Analyzing the effectiveness of touch keystroke dynamic authentication for the arabic language,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 9963129, 2021.

[2] L. Yang and S.-F. Qin, “A review of emotion recognition methods from keystroke, mouse, and touchscreen dynamics,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 162 197–162 213, 2021. [3] M. Alazab, S. P. RM, P. M, P. K. R. Maddikunta, T. R. Gadekallu, and Q.-V. Pham, “Federated learning for cybersecurity: Concepts, challenges, and future directions,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 3501–3509, 2022.

[4] I. Stylios, A. Skalkos, S. Kokolakis, and M. Karyda, “Bioprivacy: Development of a keystroke dynamics continuous authentication system,” in European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. Springer, 2021, pp. 158–170.

[5] M. A. A. Al-Qershi, B. B. Gupta, and N. A. Al-Turjman, “Bioprivacy: a behavioral biometrics continuous authentication system based on keystroke dynamics and touch gestures,” Information & Computer Security, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 687–704, 2022.

[6] H.-C. Chang, J. Li, C.-S. Wu, and M. Stamp, “Machine learning and deep learning for fixed-text keystroke dynamics,” in Artificial intelligence for cybersecurity. Springer, 2022, pp. 309–329.

[7] B. Bischl, M. Binder, M. Lang, T. Pielok, J. Richter, S. Coors, J. Thomas, T. Ullmann, M. Becker, A.-L. Boulesteix et al., “Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 13, no. 2, p. e1484, 2023.

[8] T. Dokeroglu, A. Deniz, and H. E. Kiziloz, “A comprehensive survey on recent metaheuristics for feature selection,” Neurocomputing, vol. 494, pp. 269–296, 2022.

[9] A. Guarino, D. Malandrino, R. Zaccagnino, C. Capo, and N. Lettieri, “Touchscreen gestures as images. a transfer learning approach for soft biometric traits recognition,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 219, p. 119614, 2023.

[10] J. Jung, H.-C. Moon, J. Kim, D. Kim, and K.-A. Toh, “Wi-fi based user identification using in-air handwritten signature,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 53 548–53 565, 2021.

[11] M. Goyal and D. Srivastava, “A behaviour-based authentication to internet of things using machine learning,” Design and Development of Efficient Energy Systems, pp. 245–263, 2022.

[12] I. Stylios, S. Chatzis, O. Thanou, and S. Kokolakis, “Continuous authentication with feature-level fusion of touch gestures and keystroke dynamics to solve security and usability issues,” Computers & Security, vol. 132, p. 103363, 2023.

[13] R. Ryu, S. Yeom, D. Herbert, and J. Dermoudy, “The design and evaluation of adaptive biometric authentication systems: Current status, challenges and future direction,” ICT Express, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1183– 1197, 2023.

[14] V. Gurˇcinas, J. Dautartas, J. Januleviˇcius, N. Goranin, and A. ˇCenys, “A deep-learning-based approach to keystroke-injection payload generation,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 13, p. 2894, 2023.

[15] R. Shadman, A. A. Wahab, M. Manno, M. Lukaszewski, D. Hou, and F. Hussain, “Keystroke dynamics: Concepts, techniques, and applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04605



, 2023.

[16] M. L. Ali, K. Thakur, and M. A. Obaidat, “A hybrid method for keystroke biometric user identification,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 17, p. 2782, 2022.

[17] K. Shekhawat and D. P. Bhatt, “A novel approach for user authentication using keystroke dynamics,” Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2015–2027, 2022.

[18] Y. Shi, X. Wang, K. Zheng, and S. Cao, “User authentication method based on keystroke dynamics and mouse dynamics using hda,” Multimedia Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 653–668, 2023.

[19] D. Kavitha et al., “Security enhancement in social media users using keystroke biometrics.” Grenze International Journal of Engineering & Technology (GIJET), vol. 10, 2024.

[20] T. Xi, I. Kuzminykh, B. Ghita, and T. Bakhshi, “Evaluating learning algorithms for keystroke based user authentication,” in 2023 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom), 2023, pp. 283–288.

[21] E. A. Sa˘gba,s and S. Ballı, “Machine learning-based novel continuous authentication system using soft keyboard typing behavior and motion sensor data,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 5433–5445, 2024.

[22] H. AbdelRaouf, S. A. Chelloug, A. Muthanna, N. Semary, K. Amin, and M. Ibrahim, “Efficient convolutional neural network-based keystroke dynamics for boosting user authentication,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 4898, 2023.

[23] A. Buriro, S. Gupta, A. Yautsiukhin, and B. Crispo, “Risk-driven behavioral biometric-based one-shot-cum-continuous user authentication scheme,” Journal of Signal Processing Systems, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 989–1006, 2021.

Cite This Article

Choose your preferred format

format_quote
Mattar, Ebrahim A.. "Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization." Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics, vol. Volume 11, no. Issue 2, 2026, pp. 01–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JAIM.110201
Mattar, E. (2026). Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics, Volume 11(Issue 2), 01–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JAIM.110201
Mattar, Ebrahim A.. "Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization." Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics Volume 11, no. Issue 2 (2026): 01–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JAIM.110201
Mattar, E. (2026) 'Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization', Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics, Volume 11(Issue 2), pp. 01–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JAIM.110201
Mattar E. Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics. 2026;Volume 11(Issue 2):01–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JAIM.110201
E. Mattar, "Enhancing Identity Verification Reliability in Digital Environments Using Keystroke Dynamics and Dipper Throated Optimization," Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Metaheuristics, vol. Volume 11, no. Issue 2, pp. 01–19, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JAIM.110201
Digital Archive Ready